However, he gives up on this plan at the last moment. However, his mother Judith learns about his coup plan and In order to prevent such a situation from happening again, he kills Atel by adding poison to his wine, but this incident in the series does not have any historical reality. Unlike the series, Adel's mother was a woman named Osburg, not Judith. Moreover, the information that Atel Read was poisoned and killed by his mother is not available in any source. It is not mentioned in the sources of the period that there was a disagreement between the two brothers. Besides, it is not possible for Atel R to have planned a coup attempt. Because, unlike the series, Atel R Alfred came to the throne first, the date of his accession coincided with the arrival of the great infidel army to the island, and shortly after his accession After a series of battles with the vikings, he probably died of natural causes. Alfred ascended to the throne after his death. Here, too, the scriptwriters broke away from historical reality and tried to increase the viewing pleasure of the series. This event was especially designed to emphasize the brutality of medieval dynasties and to convey the conditions of the period to the audience in a better way. It may be possible, but the scriptwriters once again broke away from historical facts while designing this event. As a result, although the Vikings series is a very good series in terms of effects with high viewing pleasure and a really nice scenario, when evaluated historically, it is quite weak compared to other elements. We gave 3 points out of the score we gave, because although the events, people and places were described in a confusing way, the story reflected a certain amount of reality. Well, do not forget to indicate in the comments what your score would be for the reality of the Vikings series, see you in the next video.
